Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ÀÎÀ§Àû º´¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¾Ç°üÀý ÃÔ¿µ¹ýÀÇ Æǵ¶´É ºñ±³¿¬±¸

A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE DETECTABILITY OF TMJ RADIOGRAPHIC TECHNIQUES FOR ARTIFICIAL MANDIBULAR CONDYLAR LESIONS

Ä¡°ú¹æ»ç¼± 1997³â 27±Ç 2È£ p.117 ~ 125
Á¤ÈñÁ¤, Á¤¿¬È­, Á¶ºÀÇý,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤ÈñÁ¤ (  ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾È¾Ç¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
Á¤¿¬È­ (  ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾È¾Ç¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç
Á¶ºÀÇý (  ) - ºÎ»ê´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾È¾Ç¸é¹æ»ç¼±Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â Àΰø ÇϾǰúµÎ»ó¿¡ ħ½Ä, °ñÁõ½Äü, ÆíÆòÈ­µî ÀÎÀ§ÀûÀÎ °ñ º´¼Ò¸¦ Çü¼ºÇÏ¿© ÆÄ
³ë¶ó¸¶, °æµÎ°³, °æ¾È¿Í ÃÔ¿µ¹ý, Ãø¹æ ¹× ÀüÈÄ¹æ °³º°È­ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ¹ýÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ÇϾǰúµÎ º´
¼Ò¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¢ ÃÔ¿µ¹ýÀÇ Æǵ¶´ÉÀ» ºñ±³Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇàµÇ¾ú´Ù.
°á°ú´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù.
1. ħ½Ä º´¼ÒÀÇ Æǵ¶´ÉÀº ÀüÈÄ¹æ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ¹ý(96%), Ãø¹æ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ¹ý (78%), °æ¾È¿Í
(59%), °æµÎ°³(56%), Æijë¶ó¸¶ ÃÔ¿µ¹ý(48%) ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
2. ħ½Ä º´¼ÒÀÇ À§Ä¡º° Æǵ¶´É ºñ±³¿¡¼­ Æijë¶ó¸¶ ÃÔ¿µ¹ýÀº ³»Ãø 1/3ºÎÀ§, °æµÎ°³ÃÔ¿µ ¹ý
Àº ¿ÜÃø 1/3ºÎÀ§, °æ¾È¿Í ÃÔ¿µ¹ý Àº ÀüÈĹæÀÇ Áß¾ÓºÎÀ§, Ãø¹æ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ¹ýÀº ³»¿ÜÃøÀÇ Áß¾ÓºÎ
À§ ¹× ÈĹæ 1/3ºÎÀ§ ¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¿ì¼öÇÑ Æǵ¶´ÉÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, ÀüÈÄ¹æ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â Àü¿ÜÃø
ÀÇ ÇÑ º´¼Ò¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇÑ ¸ðµç º´¼Ò¸¦ È®ÀÎÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù.
3. °ñÁõ½ÄüÀÇ °üµ¶´ÉÀº Ãø¹æ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ¹ý (100%), °æµÎ°³ ÃÔ¿µ¹ý(78%), Æijë¶ó¸¶ ÃÔ¿µ¹ý
(56%) ¼øÀ̾ú´Ù.
4. ÆíÆòÈ­ÀÇ Æǵ¶¿¡¼­ Ãø¹æ ´ÜÃþÃÔ¿µ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â ÇϾǰúµÎÀÇ ÇüÅ º¯È­°¡ °üÂûµÇ¾úÀ¸³ª, Æijë
¶ó¸¶ ¹× °æµÎ°³ ÃÔ¿µ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â Àü¹æºÎÀÇ °ñ ¹ÐµµÀúÇϸ¸ÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the detectability of various radiographic
techniques for mandibular condylar lesions. Erosive lesion, osteophyte and flattening
were formed on the artificial mandibular condyle, and panoramic, transcranial,
transorbital radiography, lateral and frontal topography were taken.
The results were as follows;
1. The detectability for erosive lesions was superior in the order of frontal
tomography(96%), lateral tomography(78%), transorbital(59%), transcranial (56%) and
panoramic(48%) radiography.
2. The location of erosive lesion that showed the highest detectability was the medial
third in panoramic, the lateral third in transcranial, the central portion of anteroposterior
direction in transorbital, the central portion of mediolateral direction and the posterior
third in lateral nomography Frontal tomography disclosed all erosive lesions except one
anterolateral lesion.
3. The detectability of osteophyte was 100% in lateral tomography, 78% in transcranial
and 56% in panoramic radiography.
4. For flattening, lateral tomography showed the flattened condyle, but both panoramic
and transcranial views showed only decreased bone density without the change of
condylar shape.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸